Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

Mechanistic, or biotic organizations: Research of organizational principles towards sustainability of social systems

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title Mechanistic, or biotic organizations: Research of organizational principles towards sustainability of social systems en
dc.contributor.author Slinták, Karel
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues
dc.identifier.issn 2029-7017 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2017
utb.relation.volume 7
utb.relation.issue 1
dc.citation.spage 95
dc.citation.epage 112
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania
dc.identifier.doi 10.9770/jssi.2017.6.1(8)
dc.subject Adhocracy en
dc.subject Leadership en
dc.subject Living system en
dc.subject Mechanistic system en
dc.subject Service to society en
dc.subject Shared vision en
dc.description.abstract This article deals with the question of how we perceive organizations - as machines for making money, or as living systems with specific needs and objectives. In accordance with these views, a model of a biotic organization has been created with the research aim to measure the level of representation of biotic organizations in the business environment. The model of a biotic organization consists of four principles: amorphous structure, leadership, shared vision and service to its own environment. In practice, the existence of the individual elements of the biotic organization were evaluated by quantitative and qualitative research. Answers were sought and found to the four partial questions put forward, namely: What is the purpose of the existence of the organization? What type of structure is applied in organizations? Is there a shared vision within organizations? Which of these principles, management or leadership, is applied more in practice? The results of the research show that only five percent of organizations in the business environment are biotic organizations. This confirms the research hypothesis that this organizational form is not prevalent in the current economic environment. The low level application of biotic principles reveals that most companies are still organized on the basis of the principles of mechanistic organizations. This is reflected in formal hierarchies, a pyramidal structure and traditional management that create an environment of command and control. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1007542
utb.identifier.obdid 43876604
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85030636181
utb.source j-scopus
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-15T16:31:25Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-15T16:31:25Z
dc.rights Attribution 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.rights.access openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor Slinták, Karel
utb.fulltext.affiliation Karel Slinták1 1 Tomas Bata University in Zlín, nám. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01, Zlín E-mail: 1 slintak@fame.utb.cz
utb.fulltext.dates Received 11 December 2016; accepted 25 March 2017
utb.fulltext.references Bateson, G. (1972). Steps To an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine. Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory-the skeleton of science.Management science, 2(3), 197-208. Bragdon, J. H. (2009). Capitalism as a Human System: The Value of Relational Equity. Reflections, 10(1). Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation.University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (2000). Mechanistic and organic systems of management. Technology, organizations, and innovation: Critical perspectives on business and management, Routledge, London, New York, 24-50. Carney, B. M., & Getz, I. (2013). Freedom, Inc.: Free your employees and let them lead your business to higher productivity, profits, and growth. Praha: PeopleComm. Čirjevskis, A. (2015). Dynamic capabilities in abmidextrous organisation, decision making pattern for sustainable future, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, vol 3 no 2, pp. 129-136. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2015.3.2(1) Cochran, G. W. (1977). Sampling Techniques, New York: Wiley. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. (1994). Built to Last: successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper-Business. Covey, R., S. (2010). The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness. Praha: Management Press. Covey, R., S. (2013). The 3rd Alternative: Solving Life’s Most Difficult Problems. Praha: Management Press. De Geus, A. (1997). The living company: habits for survival in a turbulent environment. London: Nicholas Brealey. Drucker, P. F. (1995). Management in a Time of Great Change. New York: Dutton. Drucker, P. F. (Ed.). (2003). A Functioning Society: Selections from Sixty-five Years of Wrinting on Community, Society, and Polity. Transaction Publishers. Fayol, H. (1916). General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman. Forrester, W., J. (1987). Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 136-149. Gouldner, A. W. (1959). Organizational analysis. Hamel, G. (2011). First, let’s fire all the managers. Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 48-60. Hamel, G. (2013). What Matters Now. Praha: PeopleComm. Hamel, G., & Breen, B. (2008). The Future of Management. Praha: Management Press. Hammer, M. (2002). The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate the Decade. Praha: Management Press. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation. New York: HaperCollins. Handy, C. (1989). The age of unreason. London: Century Business. Handy, C. (1997). Hungry Spirit: Beyond Capitalism: A Quest for Spirit in the Modern World. London: Hutchinson. Harung, S. H. (2004). Invincible Leadership. Praha: Euromedia Group. Heskett, J. L., & Kotter, J. P. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Business Review. Vol, 2, 83-93. Hock, D. (2000). Birth of the Chaordic Age. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Hock, D. (2005). One from many: Visa and the rise of chaordic organization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. Kaźmierczyk, J.; Aptacy, M. (2016). The management by objectives in banks: the Polish case, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, vol 4, no 2, p.p. 146-158. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(3) Kelly, K. (1995). Out of control: the new biology of machines, social systems and the economic world. Basic Books. Kelly, K. (2007). The New Biology of Business. In Gibson, R., Rethinking the Future: Rethinking Business Principles Competition Control & Complexity Leadership Markets and the World. Praha: Management Press. Kiefer, Ch, & Stroh, P. (1983). A new paradigm for organization development. Training & Development Journal, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 26-34. Kotter, P. J. (2000). Leading Change. Praha: Management Press. Kotter, P. J., Heskett, L. J. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Free Press. Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch, J. W., & Garrison, J. S. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration (p. 1976). Boston, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University. Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. Sociocybernetic paradoxes, 172-192. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2013). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business Press. Sandow, D., & Allen, A. M. (2005). The nature of social collaboration: how work really gets done. Reflections: The SoL Journal, 6(2-3), 2-3. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday. Senge, P. (2007). Through the Eye of a Needle. In Gibson, R., Rethinking the Future: Rethinking Business Principles Competition Control & Complexity Leadership Markets and the World. Praha: Management Press. Senge, P., & Carstedt, G. (2001). Inovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution. Sloan Management Review, vol. 42, pp. 24-38. Slinták, K. (2013). The Principles of Mechanical Organization. Auspicia, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 28-34. Taylor, W. F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York & London: Harper Brothers. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. 1967. SHAFRITZ, Jay M.; OTT, J. Steven. Classics of organization theory, 4. Thompson, J. D. (2011). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory (Vol. 1). Transaction publishers. Thompson, J. D., & Hawkes, R. W. (1962). Disaster, community organization and administrative process. Administrative Science Center, University of Pittsburgh. Tvaronavičienė, M. (2016). Start-ups across the EU: if particular tendencies could be trace, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, vo. 3, no 3, pp. 290-298. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.3(6) Weber, M. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. Trans. AM Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.
utb.scopus.affiliation Tomas Bata University in Zlín, nám. T. G. Masaryka 5555, Zlín, Czech Republic
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam

Attribution 3.0 Unported Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je Attribution 3.0 Unported