Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

On the importance of being stable: evolutionarily frozen species can win in fluctuating environments

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title On the importance of being stable: evolutionarily frozen species can win in fluctuating environments en
dc.contributor.author Flegr, Jaroslav
dc.contributor.author Ponížil, Petr
dc.relation.ispartof Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
dc.identifier.issn 0024-4066 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2018
utb.relation.volume 125
utb.relation.issue 1
dc.citation.spage 210
dc.citation.epage 220
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/biolinnean/bly110
dc.relation.uri https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-abstract/125/1/210/5063273
dc.subject sexual species en
dc.subject competition en
dc.subject evolvability en
dc.subject extinction en
dc.subject frozen plasticity en
dc.subject model en
dc.subject origin of sex en
dc.subject punctuated equilibrium en
dc.subject sex en
dc.subject stability-based sorting en
dc.description.abstract The ability of organisms to respond adaptively to environmental changes (evolvability) is usually considered to be an important advantage in interspecific competition. It has been suggested, however, that evolvability could be a double-edged sword that could present a handicap in fluctuating environments. The authors of this counterintuitive idea have published only verbal models to support their claims. Here, we present the results of individual-based stochastic modelling of competition between two asexual species that differ only by their evolvability. They show that, in changeable environments, less evolvable species could outperform their more evolvable competitors in a broad area of a parameter space. Highly evolvable species prospered better nearly all the time; however, they sustained a higher probability of extinction during rare events of the rapid transient change of conditions. It explains why sexual species, with their reduced capacity to respond adaptively to local or temporal environmental changes, prevail in nearly all biotopes. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Technology
utb.faculty University Institute
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1008203
utb.identifier.obdid 43878988
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85055111828
utb.identifier.wok 000442937000018
utb.identifier.coden BJLSB
utb.source j-wok
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-03T11:13:02Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-03T11:13:02Z
dc.description.sponsorship CESNET [LM2015042]; CERIT Scientific Cloud [LM2015085]; Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [18-13692S]; Charles University of Prague [UNCE 204056]; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - Programme NPU I [LO1504]
utb.ou Centre of Polymer Systems
utb.contributor.internalauthor Ponížil, Petr
utb.fulltext.affiliation JAROSLAV FLEGR 1* and PETR PONÍŽIL 2,3 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic 2 Department of Physics and Materials Engineering, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Vavrečkova 275, 760 01 Zlin, Czech Republic 3 Center of Polymer Systems, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, 762 72 Zlin, Czech Republic *Corresponding author. E-mail: flegr@cesnet.cz;
utb.fulltext.dates Received 27 April 2018 revised 11 July 2018 accepted for publication 11 July 2018
utb.fulltext.references Bell G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bürger R. 1999. Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in changing environments. Genetics 153: 1055–1069. Carson HL. 1968. The population flush and its genetic consequences. In: Lewontin RC, ed. Population biology and evolution. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 123–137. Casinos A. 2017. From Cuénot’s préadaptation to Gould and Vrba’s exaptation: a review. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 239–247. Charlesworth B. 2006. The evolutionary biology of sex. Current Biology 16: R693–R695. Dias PC, Blondel J. 1996. Local specialization and maladaptation in the Mediterranean blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Oecologia 107: 79–86. Flegr J. 1994. Chemostat-turbidostat discontinuum, r-K continuum and population-size regulating mechanism. Acta Societatis Zoologica Bohemica 58: 143–149. Flegr J. 1997. Two distinct types of natural selection in turbidostat-like and chemostat-like ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 188: 121–126. Flegr J. 2010. Elastic, not plastic species: frozen plasticity theory and the origin of adaptive evolution in sexually reproducing organisms. Biology Direct 5: 2. Flegr J. 2013. Microevolutionary, macroevolutionary, ecological and taxonomical implications of punctuational theories of adaptive evolution. Biology Direct 8: 1. Gandon S, Otto SP. 2007. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 175: 1835–1853. Gould SJ. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 205: 581–598. Green RF, Noakes DL. 1995. Is a little bit of sex as good as a lot? Journal of Theoretical Biology 174: 87–96. Griffiths PE, Neumann-Held EM. 1999. The many faces of the gene. BioScience 49: 656–662. Haldane JBS. 1956. The relation between density regulation and natural selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 145: 306–308. Hörandl E, Hadacek F. 2013. The oxidative damage initiation hypothesis for meiosis. Plant Reproduction 26: 351–367. Kondrashov AS. 1982. Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. Genetical Research 40: 325–332. Kondrashov AS. 1993. Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. The Journal of Heredity 84: 372–387. Lewis J, Wolpert L. 1979. Diploidy, evolution and sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology 78: 425–438. Maynard Smith J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mayr E. 1954. Change of genetic environment and evolution. In: Ford EB, Huxley J, Hardy AC, eds. Evolution as a process. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 157–180. Morand S, Poulin R, Rohde K, Hayward C. 1999. Aggregation and species coexistence of ectoparasites of marine fishes. International Journal for Parasitology 29: 663–672. Muller HJ. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutation Research 106: 2–9. Otto SP. 2009. The evolutionary enigma of sex. The American Naturalist 174(Suppl 1): S1–S14. Payne JL, Finnegan S. 2007. The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 10506–10511. Pearson PN. 1998. Speciation and extinction asymmetries in paleontological phylogenies: evidence for evolutionary progress? Paleobiology 24: 305–335. Roughgarden J. 1991. The evolution of sex. The American Naturalist 138: 934–953. Schwartz J. 2002. Population genetics and sociobiology: conflicting views of evolution. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45: 224–240. Templeton AR. 2008. The reality and importance of founder speciation in evolution. Bioessays 30: 470–479. Toman J, Flegr J. 2017. Stability-based sorting: the forgotten process behind (not only) biological evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 435: 29–41. Toman J, Flegr J. 2018. General environmental heterogeneity as the explanation of sexuality? Comparative study shows that ancient asexual taxa are associated with both biotically and abiotically homogeneous environments. Ecology and Evolution 8: 973–991. Vrba S, Gould SJ. 1986. The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology 12: 217–228. Waxman D, Peck JR. 1999. Sex and adaptation in a changing environment. Genetics 153: 1041–1053. Williams GC. 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship We would like to thank Charlie Lotterman for his help with the final version of the paper, and three anonymous referees and the editor of Axios Review Society for their extremely useful suggestions. Computational resources were provided by the CESNET LM2015042 and the CERIT Scientific Cloud LM2015085, provided under the programme ‘Projects of Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures’. J.F.’s work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grant no. 18-13692S), Charles University of Prague (grant UNCE 204056) and P.P.’s work by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic – Programme NPU I (LO1504).
utb.wos.affiliation [Flegr, Jaroslav] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Biol, Fac Sci, Vinicna 7, Prague 12844, Czech Republic; [Ponizil, Petr] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Dept Phys & Mat Engn, Vavreckova 275, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic; [Ponizil, Petr] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Ctr Polymer Syst, Zlin 76272, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects CESNET LM2015042
utb.fulltext.projects CESNET LM2015085
utb.fulltext.projects UNCE 204056
utb.fulltext.projects NPU I (LO1504)
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam