Kontaktujte nás | Jazyk: čeština English
dc.title | Evaluation of breast stiffness pathology based on breast compression during mammography: Proposal for novel breast stiffness scale classification | en |
dc.contributor.author | Prokop, Jiří | |
dc.contributor.author | Maršálek, Pavel | |
dc.contributor.author | Sengul, Ilker | |
dc.contributor.author | Pelikán, Anton | |
dc.contributor.author | Janoutová, Jana | |
dc.contributor.author | Horyl, Petr | |
dc.contributor.author | Roman, Jan | |
dc.contributor.author | Sengul, Demet | |
dc.contributor.author | Junior, José Maria Soares | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinics | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1807-5932 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1980-5322 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
utb.relation.volume | 77 | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Universidade de Sao Paulo | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100100 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593222033014 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593222033014/pdfft | |
dc.subject | breast | en |
dc.subject | mammography | en |
dc.subject | stiffness | en |
dc.subject | breast pathology | en |
dc.subject | novel | en |
dc.subject | scale | en |
dc.description.abstract | Breast cancer is diagnosed through a patient's Breast Self-Examination (BSE), Clinical Breast Examination (CBE), or para-clinical methods. False negativity of PCM in breast cancer diagnostics leads to a persisting problem associ-ated with breast tumors diagnosed only in advanced stages. As the tumor volume/size at which it becomes inva-sive is not clear, BSE and CBE play an exceedingly important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. The quality and effectiveness of BSE and CBE depend on several factors, among which breast stiffness is the most important one. In this study, the authors present four methods for evaluating breast stiffness pathology during mammography examination based on the outputs obtained during the breast compression process, id est, without exposing the patient to X-Ray radiation. Based on the subjective assessment of breast stiffness by experienced medical examiners, a novel breast stiffness classification was designed, and the best method of its objective mea-surement was calibrated to fit the scale. Hence, this study provides an objective tool for the identification of patients who, being unable to perform valid BSE, could benefit from an increased frequency of mammography screening. Dum vivimus servimus. | en |
utb.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1011145 | |
utb.identifier.obdid | 43883894 | |
utb.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85138374020 | |
utb.identifier.wok | 000875233600002 | |
utb.identifier.pubmed | 36137345 | |
utb.source | j-scopus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-05T13:13:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-05T13:13:10Z | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, MŠMT: SP2021/66; Ostravská Univerzita v Ostravě | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, the Czechia [SGS02/LF/2016, SGS16/LF/2017]; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports from the Specific Research Project [SP2021/66]; VSB-University of Ostrava, Ostrava, the Czechia [SP2021/66]; University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
utb.ou | Department of Health Care Sciences | |
utb.contributor.internalauthor | Pelikán, Anton | |
utb.fulltext.affiliation | Jiří Prokop a,b,c, Pavel Maršálek d, Ilker Sengul e,f,*, Anton Pelikan b,c,g, Jana Janoutova h, Petr Horyl d, Jan Roman b,c, Demet Sengul i , Jose Maria Soares Junior j a Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czechia b Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czechia c Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czechia d Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czechia e Division of Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey f Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey g Department of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czechia h Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czechia i Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey j Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Disciplina de Ginecologia São Paulo (SP), ~ Brasil *Corresponding author. E-mail address: ilker.sengul.52@gmail.com (I. Sengul). | |
utb.fulltext.dates | Received 18 May 2022 Revised 27 June 2022 Accepted 13 July 2022 | |
utb.fulltext.references | 1. McPherson K, Steel C, Dixon JM. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 2000;321(7261):624–8. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0001 2. Kirsh VA, Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, O’Malley FP, Shumak RS, Yaffe MJ, et al. Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103(12):942–50. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0002 3. Bennett RL, Sellars SJ, Moss SM. Interval cancers in the NHS breast cancer screening programme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Br J Cancer 2011;104(4):571–7. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0003 4. Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, Heikkinen P, Hyv€arinen S, Isola J, et al. The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultasonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001;67(2):117–23. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0004 5. Li T, Sun L, Miller N, Nicklee T, Woo J, Hulse-Smith L, et al. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(2):343–9. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0005 6. Alowami S, Troup S, Al-Haddad S, Kirkpatrick I, Watson PH. Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression. Breast Cancer Res 2003;5(5): R129–R35. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0006 7. Provencher L, Hogue JC, Desbiens C, Poirier B, Poirier E, Boudreau D, et al. Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection? Curr Oncol 2016;23(4). e332-e9. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0007 8. Rami~ao NG, Martins PS, Rynkevic R, Fernandes AA, Barroso M, Santos DC. Biomechanical properties of breast tissue, a state-of-the-art review. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2016;15(5):1307–23. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0008 9. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):227–36. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0009 10. Hagios C, Lochter A, Bissell MJ. Tissue architecture: the ultimate regulator of epithelial function? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998;353(1370):857–87. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0010 11. McCormack VA, Dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(6):1159–69. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0011 12. Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, Heddson B, Sundbom A, Czene K, et al. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14(4):R114. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0012 13. da Costa, Vieira RA, Biller G, Uemura G, Ruiz CA, Curado MP. Breast cancer screening in developing countries. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2017;72(4):244–53. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0013 14. Chaudhuri O, Koshy ST, Branco da Cunha C, Shin JW, Verbeke CS, Allison KH, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. Nat Mater 2014;13(10):970–8. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0014 15. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9(7):676–82. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0015 16. Boyd NF, Li Q, Melnichouk O, Huszti E, Martin LJ, Gunasekara A, et al. Evidence that breast tissue stiffness is associated with risk of breast cancer. PLoS One 2014;9(7): e100937. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0016 17. Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, Knittel JG, Yan L, Rueden CT, et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med 2008;6:11. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0017 18. Paszek MJ, Weaver VM. The tension mounts: mechanics meets morphogenesis and malignancy. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004;9(4):325–42. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0018 19. Aydin I, Kesicioglu T, Vural S, Sengul I, Yilmaz K, Sengul D. Idiopathic granulomatous lobular mastitis: An imitation of breast carcinoma. Cureus 2021;13(5):e15206. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0019 20. Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2009(2):108–22. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0020 21. Hagios C, Lochter A, Bissell MJ. Tissue architecture: the ultimate regulator of epithelial function? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998;353(1370):857–70. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0021 22. Howard CV, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. The Society of Cells - Cancer and control of cell proliferation. Oxford: Bios Scientific; 1999: 518–9. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0022 23. Feinberg AP. Epigenetic stochasticity, nuclear structure and cancer: the implications for medicine. J Intern Med 2014;276(1):5–11. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0023 24. Timp W, Feinberg AP. Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host. Nat Rev Cancer 2013;13(7):497–510. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0024 25. Šmardová J, Koptíkova J. Dva pohledy na vyvoj nádoru. Klin Onkol 2016;29(4):259–66. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0025 26. Doyley MM. Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem. Phys Med Biol 2012;57(3):35–73. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0026 27. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T, et al. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1999;213(3):203–33. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0027 28. Weiss NS. Breast cancer mortality in relation to clinical breast examination and breast self-examination. Breast 2003;9(Suppl 2):S86–S9. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0028 29. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, Wang WW, Allison CJ, Chen FL, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94 (19):1445–57. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0029 30. Mokhatri-Hesari P, Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in brest cacer patients: review of reviewa 2008 to 2018. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020;18(1):338. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0030 31. Ngan TT, Nguyen NTQ, Van Minh H, Donnelly M, O’Neill C. Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a ‘stand-alone’ screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):1070. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0031 32. Collaboration Global BMI Mortality, E Di Angelantonio, Bhupathiraju S, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet 2016;388(10046):776–86. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0032 33. Marsalek P, Sotola M, Rybansky D, Repa V, Halama R, Fusek M, et al. Modeling and testing of flexible structures with selected planar patterns used in biomedical applications. Materials 2021;14(1):140. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0033 34. Sotola M, Stareczek D, Rybansky D, Prokop J, Marsalek P. New design procedure of transtibial prosthesis bed stump using topological optimization method. Symmetry 2020;12:1837. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1807-5932(22)03301-4/sbref0034 | |
utb.fulltext.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, the Czechia with the grant numbers [SGS02/LF/2016] and [SGS16/LF/2017]; The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports from the Specific Research Project&VSB-University of Ostrava, Ostrava, the Czechia with the grant number [SP2021/66]; and the APC was funded by the University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia. | |
utb.wos.affiliation | [Prokop, Jiri] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ostrava, Czech Republic; [Prokop, Jiri; Pelikan, Anton; Roman, Jan] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Surg, Ostrava, Czech Republic; [Prokop, Jiri; Pelikan, Anton; Roman, Jan] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, Dept Surg Studies, Ostrava, Czech Republic; [Marsalek, Pavel; Horyl, Petr] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Appl Mech, Ostrava, Czech Republic; [Sengul, Ilker] Giresun Univ, Fac Med, Div Endocrine Surg, Giresun, Turkey; [Sengul, Ilker] Giresun Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Giresun, Turkey; [Pelikan, Anton] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Humanities, Dept Hlth Care Sci, Zlin, Czech Republic; [Janoutova, Jana] Palacky Univ Olomouc, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Publ Hlth, Olomouc, Czech Republic; [Sengul, Demet] Giresun Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Giresun, Turkey; [Soares Junior, Jose Maria] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp This Clin, Fac Med, Dept Obstetricia & Ginecol,Disciplina Ginecol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil | |
utb.scopus.affiliation | Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic; Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic; Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic; Division of Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey; Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey; Department of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Disciplina de Ginecologia, São Paulo (SP), Brazil | |
utb.fulltext.projects | SGS02/LF/2016 | |
utb.fulltext.projects | SGS16/LF/2017 | |
utb.fulltext.projects | SP2021/66 | |
utb.fulltext.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | |
utb.fulltext.ou | Department of Health Care Sciences |