Influence of metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial additives embedded in waterborne coating binders based on self-crosslinking acrylic latex

Steinerová, Denisa; Kalendová, Andréa; Machotová, Jana; Knotek, Petr; Humpolíček, Petr; Vajďák, Jan; Šlang, Stanislav; Krejčová, Anna; Beneš, Ludvík; Wolff-Fabris, Felipe

dc.title	Influence of metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial additives embedded in waterborne coating binders based on self-crosslinking acrylic latex	en
dc.contributor.author	Steinerová, Denisa
dc.contributor.author	Kalendová, Andréa
dc.contributor.author	Machotová, Jana
dc.contributor.author	Knotek, Petr
dc.contributor.author	Humpolíček, Petr
dc.contributor.author	Vajďák, Jan
dc.contributor.author	Šlang, Stanislav
dc.contributor.author	Krejčová, Anna
dc.contributor.author	Beneš, Ludvík
dc.contributor.author	Wolff-Fabris, Felipe
dc.relation.ispartof	Coatings
dc.identifier.issn	2079-6412 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued	2022
utb.relation.volume	12
utb.relation.issue	10
dc.type	article
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	MDPI
dc.identifier.doi	10.3390/coatings12101445
dc.relation.uri	https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/12/10/1445
dc.relation.uri	https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/12/10/1445/pdf?version=1665734981
dc.subject	keto-hydrazide crosslinking	en
dc.subject	ionic crosslinking	en
dc.subject	nanostructured magnesium oxide	en
dc.subject	zinc oxide and lanthanum oxide	en
dc.subject	antimicrobial activity	en
dc.description.abstract	This article deals with the simple preparation of environmentally friendly acrylic latex binders, which are functionalized with nanoparticles of metal oxides, namely MgO, ZnO, La2O3 and combinations of MgO and ZnO, serving as functional components to achieve antimicrobial properties, but also to improve physical-mechanical properties and chemical resilience. The incorporation of uncoated powder nanoparticles was performed during the synthesis, using the two-stage semi-continuous emulsion radical polymerization technique, to obtain latexes containing 0.5%-1.3% nanoparticles relative to the polymer content. Changes in latex performance due to nanoparticles were compared from the point of view of the type and concentration of metal oxide nanoparticles in latex. The results of the tests showed that all types of nanoparticles showed very promising properties, while with increasing concentration of nanoparticles there was an improvement in properties. The nanoparticles in latex provided interfacially crosslinked transparent smooth coating films with high gloss and good physical-mechanical properties. Latexes containing the highest concentration of nanoparticles provided coatings with significant antimicrobial activity against all tested bacterial and fungal strains, but also in-can preservative stability of liquid latex. Furthermore, the coatings were resistant to solvents, and in addition, latexes with MgO nanoparticles showed a significant decrease in the minimum film-forming temperature, and latex with a concentration of about 1.3% MgO did not show any flash corrosion under the coating film cast on a steel substrate. The latexes containing MgO and La2O3 nanoparticles provided coatings that were very resistant to water bleaching.	en
utb.faculty	University Institute
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1011206
utb.identifier.obdid	43884256
utb.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-85140906823
utb.identifier.wok	000872490800001
utb.source	j-scopus
dc.date.accessioned	2022-11-29T07:49:19Z
dc.date.available	2022-11-29T07:49:19Z
dc.description.sponsorship	RP/CPS/2022/001; Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, MŠMT: LM2018103
dc.description.sponsorship	Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LM2018103]; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic-DKRVO [RP/CPS/2022/001]
dc.rights	Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.access	openAccess
utb.ou	Centre of Polymer Systems
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Humpolíček, Petr
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Vajďák, Jan
utb.fulltext.affiliation	Denisa Steinerová 1,* , Andréa Kalendová 1, Jana Machotová 1, Petr Knotek 2, Petr Humpolíček 3, Jan Vajdák 3, Stanislav Slang 4, Anna Krejčová 5, Ludvík Beneš 6 and Felipe Wolff-Fabris 7 1 Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic 2 Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic 3 Centre of Polymer Systems, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic 4 Center of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic 5 Institute of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic 6 Joint Laboratory of Solid State Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic 7 European Center for Dispersion Technologies, 95100 Selb, Germany * Correspondence: steinerovadenisa@gmail.com; Tel.: +420-727-843-211
utb.fulltext.dates	Received: 19 August 2022 Revised: 25 September 2022 Accepted: 26 September 2022 Published: 30 September 2022
utb.fulltext.references	1. Faccini, M.; Bautista, L.; Soldi, L.; Escobar, A.M.; Altavilla, M.; Calvet, M.; Domenech, A.; Domínguez, E. Environmentally friendly anticorrosive polymeric coatings. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 2. Noreen, A.; Zia, K.M.; Zuber, M.; Tabasum, S.; Saif, M.J. Recent trends in environmentally friendly water-borne polyurethane coatings: A review. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 3. Berenjian, A.; Chang, N.; Malmiri, H.J. Volatile organic compounds removal methods: A review. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 8, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 4. Maniglia, B.C.; Castanha, N.; Le Bail, P.; Le Bail, A.; Augusto, P.E.D. Starch modification through environmentally friendly alternatives: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2482–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 5. Fulmer, P.A.; Wynne, J.H. Development of Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Latex Paint Surfaces Employing Active Amphiphilic Compounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2878–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 6. Bellotti, N.; Deyá, C. Waterborne functional paints to control biodeterioration. In Handbook of Waterborne Coatings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 155–179. ISBN 9780128142011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 7. Han, W.; Wu, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y. Graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs)—Promising materials for antimicrobial coating and film: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 358, 1022–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 8. Cloutier, M.; Mantovani, D.; Rosei, F. Antibacterial Coatings: Challenges, Perspectives, and Opportunities. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 9. Chen, L.; Song, X.; Xing, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; He, Z.; Sun, L. A Review on Antimicrobial Coatings for Biomaterial Implants and Medical Devices. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2020, 16, 789–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 10. Mishra, P.K.; Giagli, K.; Tsalagkas, D.; Mishra, H.; Talegaonkar, S.; Gryc, V.; Wimmer, R. Changing Face of Wood Science in Modern Era: Contribution of Nanotechnology. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 12, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 11. Athawale, V.D.; Nimbalkar, R.V. Waterborne Coatings Based on Renewable Oil Resources: An Overview. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 159–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 12. Parvate, S.; Mahanwar, P. Advances in self-crosslinking of acrylic emulsion: What we know and what we would like to know. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2019, 40, 519–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 13. Mariz, I.d.F.A.; Millichamp, I.S.; de la Cal, J.C.; Leiza, J.R. High performance water-borne paints with high volume solids based on bimodal latexes. Prog. Org. Coat. 2010, 68, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 14. Khaletskaya, K.; Khaletski, V.; Švedienė, S.; Mažeikienė, A. Environmental-friendly architectural water-borne paint for outdoor application: Twenty years of experience in Belarus and Lithuania. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference “ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING”, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22–23 May 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] 15. Sørensen, P.A.; Kiil, S.; Dam-Johansen, K.; Weinell, C.E. Anticorrosive coatings: A review. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2009, 6, 135–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 16. Wagle, P.G.; Tamboli, S.S.; More, A.P. Peelable coatings: A review. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 150, 106005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 17. Overbeek, A.; Bückmann, F.; Martin, E.; Steenwinkel, P.; Annable, T. New generation decorative paint technology. Prog. Org. Coat. 2003, 48, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 18. Bauer, P.; Denk, P.; Fuss, J.M.; Lorber, K.; Ortner, E.; Buettner, A. Correlations between odour activity and the structural modifications of acrylates. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 5545–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 19. McCready, D. A tiered approach for assessing dermal exposure to constituents in latex paint. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2009, 15, 1227–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 20. Wu, S.; Soucek, M.D. Model compound study for acrylic latex crosslinking reactions with cycloaliphatic epoxides. J. Coat. Technol. 1997, 69, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 21. Tillet, G.; Boutevin, B.; Ameduri, B. Chemical reactions of polymer crosslinking and post-crosslinking at room and medium temperature. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 191–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 22. González, I.; Asua, J.M.; Leiza, J.R. Crosslinking in Acetoacetoxy Functional Waterborne Crosslinkable Latexes. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 243, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 23. Machotová, J.; Kalendová, A.; Steinerová, D.; Mácová, P.; Šlang, S.; Šňupárek, J.; Vajdák, J. Water-Resistant Latex Coatings: Tuning of Properties by Polymerizable Surfactant, Covalent Crosslinking and Nanostructured ZnO Additive. Coatings 2021, 11, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 24. Taylor, J.W.; Winnik, M.A. Functional latex and thermoset latex films. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2004, 1, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 25. Ooka, M.; Ozawa, H. Recent developments in crosslinking technology for coating resins. Prog. Org. Coat. 1994, 23, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 26. Machotová, J.; Knotek, P.; Černošková, E.; Svoboda, R.; Zárybnická, L.; Kohl, M.; Kalendová, A. Effect of Fluorinated Comonomer, Polymerizable Emulsifier, and Crosslinking on Water Resistance of Latex Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 27. Fred, B.; Ad, O.T.N.; Tijs, N. Self Crosslinking Surfactant Free Acrylic Dispersion. Eur. Coat. J. 2001, 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar] 28. Nakayama, Y. Development of novel aqueous coatings which meet the requirements of ecology-conscious society: Novel cross-linking system based on the carbonyl–hydrazide reaction and its applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2004, 51, 280–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 29. Kessel, N.; Illsley, D.R.; Keddie, J.L. The diacetone acrylamide crosslinking reaction and its influence on the film formation of an acrylic latex. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2008, 5, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 30. Koukiotis, C.; Sideridou, I.D. Synthesis and characterization of latexes based on copolymers BA\MMA\DAAM and BA\MMA\VEOVA-10\DAAM and the corresponding 1K crosslinkable binder using the adipic acid dihydrazide as crosslinking agent. Prog. Org. Coat. 2010, 69, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 31. Machotová, J.; Černošková, E.; Honzíček, J.; Šňupárek, J. Water sensitivity of fluorine-containing polyacrylate latex coatings: Effects of crosslinking and ambient drying conditions. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 120, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 32. Guo, T.-Y.; Liu, J.-C.; Song, M.-D.; Zhang, B.-H. Effects of carboxyl group on the ambient self-crosslinkable polyacrylate latices. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 3948–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 33. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, H. The diacetone acrylamide crosslinking reaction and its control of core-shell polyacrylate latices at ambient temperature. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 123, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 34. Guiamet, P.S.; Videla, H.A. Microbiological Spoilage of Aqueous Based Surface Coatings. Corros. Rev. 1996, 14, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 35. Samyn, P.; Bosmans, J.; Cosemans, P. Current Alternatives for In-Can Preservation of Aqueous Paints: A Review. Mater. Procceding 2021, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 36. Silva, V.; Silva, C.; Soares, P.; Garrido, E.M.; Borges, F.; Garrido, J. Isothiazolinone Biocides: Chemistry, Biological, and Toxicity Profiles. Molecules 2020, 25, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 37. Okamura, H.; Togosmaa, L.; Sawamoto, T.; Fukushi, K.; Nishida, T.; Beppu, T. Effects of metal pyrithione antifoulants on freshwater macrophyte Lemna gibba G3 determined by image analysis. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 1102–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 38. Amara, I.; Miled, W.; Slama, R.B.; Ladhari, N. Antifouling processes and toxicity effects of antifouling paints on marine environment. A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 57, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 39. Glinel, K.; Thebault, P.; Humblot, V.; Pradier, C.M.; Jouenne, T. Antibacterial surfaces developed from bio-inspired approaches. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1670–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 40. Kandelbauer, A.; Widsten, P. Antibacterial melamine resin surfaces for wood-based furniture and flooring. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 65, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 41. Fonkwo, P.N. Pricing infectious disease. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 42. Sánchez-López, E.; Gomes, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.L.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A.; et al. Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 43. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: Present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Azam, A.; Ahmed, A.S.; Oves, M.; Khan, M.S.; Habib, S.S.; Memic, A. Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: A comparative study. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 6003–6009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 45. Dizaj, S.M.; Lotfipour, F.; Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Zarrintan, M.H.; Adibkia, K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 44, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 46. Bonnefond, A.; González, E.; Asua, J.M.; Leiza, J.R.; Kiwi, J.; Pulgarin, C.; Rtimi, S. New evidence for hybrid acrylic/TiO2 films inducing bacterial inactivation under low intensity simulated sunlight. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 47. Yilmaz Atay, H.; Yaşa, İ.; Çelik, E. Antibacterial Polymeric Coatings with Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Nano-Met. Chem. 2015, 45, 784–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 48. Thurman, R.B.; Gerba, C.P.; Bitton, G. The molecular mechanisms of copper and silver ion disinfection of bacteria and viruses. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1989, 18, 295–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 49. Domek, M.J.; Lechevallier, M.W.; Cameron, S.C.; Mcfeters, G.A. Evidence for the role of copper in the injury process of coliform bacteria in drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 48, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 50. Chandrangsu, P.; Rensing, C.; Helmann, J.D. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 51. Brabu, B.; Haribabu, S.; Revathy, M.; Anitha, S.; Thangapadian, M.; Navaneehakrisnan, K.R.; Gopalakrishnan, C.; Murugan, S.S.; Kumaavel, T.S. Biocompatibility studies on lanthanum oxide nanoparticles. Toxicol. Res. 2015, 4, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 52. Schopf, J.W.; Kudryavtsev, A.B.; Agresti, D.G.; Wdowiak, T.J.; Czaja, D. Laser–Raman imagery of Earth’s earliest fossils. Nature 2002, 416, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 53. Mekhemer, G.A.H. Surface structure and acid–base properties of lanthanum oxide dispersed on silica and alumina catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 5400–5405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 54. Yan, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, H. Synthesis and characterization of self-crosslinkable zinc polyacrylate latices at room temperature. Iran. Polym. J. 2012, 21, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 55. Machotová, J.; Kalendová, A.; Voleská, M.; Steinerová, D.; Pejchalová, M.; Knotek, P.; Zárybnická, L. Waterborne hygienic coatings based on self-crosslinking acrylic latex with embedded inorganic nanoparticles: A comparison of nanostructured ZnO and MgO as antibacterial additives. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 147, 105704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 56. Machotová, J.; Kalendová, A.; Zlámaná, B.; Šňupárek, J.; Palarčík, J.; Svoboda, R. Waterborne coating binders based on self-crosslinking acrylic latex with embedded inorganic nanoparticles: A comparison of nanostructured ZnO and MgO as crosslink density enhancing agents. Coatings 2020, 10, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 57. Zosel, A. Mechanical properties of films from polymer latices. Polym. Adv. Technol. 1995, 6, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 58. Kan, C.S.; Blackson, J.H. Effect of Ionomeric Behavior on the Viscoelastic Properties and Morphology of Carboxylated Latex Films. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6853–6864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 59. Richard, J.; Maquet, J. Dynamic micromechanical investigations into particle/particle interfaces in latex films. Polymer 1992, 33, 4164–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 60. Machotova, J.; Ruckerova, A.; Bohacik, P.; Pukova, K.; Kalendova, A.; Palarcik, J. High-performance one-pack ambient cross-linking latex binders containing low-generation PAMAM dendrimers and ZnO nanoparticles. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2018, 15, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 61. Lee, D.I. The effects of latex coalescence and interfacial crosslinking on the mechanical properties of latex films. Polymer 2005, 46, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 62. Danková, M.; Kalendová, A.; Machotová, J. Waterborne coatings based on acrylic latex containing nanostructured ZnO as an active additive. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2020, 17, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 63. Kalendová, A. Methods for testing and evaluating the flash corrosion. Prog. Org. Coat. 2002, 44, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 64. Novák, P. Druhy koroze kovů. Koroze A Ochr. Mater. 2005, 49, 75–82. [Google Scholar] 65. Verink, E.D. Simplified procedure for constructing Pourbaix diagrams. Uhlig’s Corros. Handb. 2011, 7, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 66. Steinerová, D.; Kalendová, A.; Machotová, J.; Pejchalová, M. Environmentally Friendly Water-Based Self-Crosslinking Acrylate Dispersion Containing Magnesium Nanoparticles and Their Films Exhibiting Antimicrobial Properties. Coatings 2020, 10, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 67. Bharadwaj, H.K.; Lee, J.-Y.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Keener, T.C. Dissolution kinetics of magnesium hydroxide for CO2 separation from coal-fired power plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 250–251, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 68. Kong, B.; Seog, J.H.; Graham, L.M.; Lee, S.B. Experimental considerations on the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2011, 6, 929–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 69. Lewinski, N.; Colvin, V.; Drezek, R. Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles. Small 2008, 4, 26–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 70. Pinho, A.R.; Martins, F.; Costa, M.E.V.; Senos, A.M.R.; da Cruz e Silva, O.A.B.; Pereira, M.d.L.; Rebelo, S. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Effects of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Spermatogonia Cells. Cells 2020, 9, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 71. Pandurangan, M.; Kim, D.H. In vitro toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles: A review. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2015, 17, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 72. Mahmoud, A.; Ezgi, Ö.; Merve, A.; Özhan, G. In Vitro Toxicological Assessment of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticle Exposure in Several Mammalian Cell Types. Int. J. Toxicol. 2016, 35, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 73. Patel, M.K.; Zafaryab, M.; Rizvi, M.M.A.; Agrawal, V.V.; Ansari, Z.A.; Malhotra, B.D.; Ansari, S.G. Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Effect of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles on Bacterial and Human Cells. J. Nanoeng. Nanomanufacturing 2013, 3, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 74. Dong, Q.; Ge, S.; Shen, Y.; Wang, H.; Yin, T.; Wang, G.; Jia, D.; Zhang, Q. Cytotoxic effects of MgO nanoparticles on human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 5, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 75. Balusamy, B.; Taştan, B.E.; Ergen, S.F.; Uyar, T.; Tekinay, T. Toxicity of lanthanum oxide (La2O3) nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2015, 17, 1265–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 76. Almukhlafi, H.; Ali, D.; Almutairi, B.; Yaseen, K.N.; Alyami, N.; Almeer, R.; Alkahtani, S.; Alarifi, S. Role of Oxidative Stress in La2O3 Nanoparticle-Induced Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis in CHANG and HuH-7 Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 3487–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 77. Lu, V.M.; Jue, T.R.; McDonald, K.L. Cytotoxic lanthanum oxide nanoparticles sensitize glioblastoma cells to radiation therapy and temozolomide: An in vitro rationale for translational studies. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 78. Zhu, X.; Zhu, L.; Duan, Z.; Qi, R.; Li, Y.; Lang, Y. Comparative toxicity of several metal oxide nanoparticle aqueous suspensions to Zebrafish (Danio rerio) early developmental stage. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2008, 43, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 79. Blinova, I.; Ivask, A.; Heinlaan, M.; Mortimer, M.; Kahru, A. Ecotoxicity of nanoparticles of CuO and ZnO in natural water. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 80. Sharma, V.; Shukla, R.K.; Saxena, N.; Parmar, D.; Das, M.; Dhawan, A. DNA damaging potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles in human epidermal cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 185, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 81. Esmaeillou, M.; Moharamnejad, M.; Hsankhani, R.; Tehrani, A.A.; Maadi, H. Toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in healthy adult mice. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 35, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 82. Sharma, V.; Singh, P.; Pandey, A.K.; Dhawan, A. Induction of oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in mouse liver after sub-acute oral exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2012, 745, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 83. Abbasalipourkabir, R.; Moradi, H.; Zarei, S.; Asadi, S.; Salehzadeh, A.; Ghafourikhosroshahi, A.; Mortazavi, M.; Ziamajidi, N. Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles on adult male Wistar rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 84, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 84. Xiao, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce renal toxicity through reactive oxygen species. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 85. Banyal, S.; Malik, P.; Tuli, H.S.; Mukherjee, T.K. Advances in nanotechnology for diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2013, 19, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 86. Fox, T.G.; Flory, P.J. Second-Order Transition Temperatures and Related Properties of Polystyrene. I. Influence of Molecular Weight. J. Appl. Phys. 1950, 21, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 87. Covington, A.K.; Bates, R.G.; Durst, R.A. Definition of pH scales, standard reference values, measurement of pH and related terminology. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 88. Bhattacharjee, S. DLS and zeta potential—What they are and what they are not? J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 89. Diesel Fuel Test Kit. Available online: https://www.dieselfueltestkit.com/ft-bug-test-kit-for-diesel-bacteria-testing/?fbclid=IwAR0ASDDOfCHmNW3i2IvPRehl0oK7ORC7M80fE_Hc3t2voVMGupCC91V2BHM (accessed on 27 March 2022). 90. Kalendová, A. Technologie Nátěrových Hmot II: Povrchové Úpravy a Způsoby Předúpravy Materiálů, 1st ed.; Univerzita Pardubice: Pardubice, Czech Republic, 2003; pp. 51–128. ISBN 80-7194-576-5. [Google Scholar] 91. Cline, J.P.; von Dreele, R.B.; Winburn, R.; Stephens, P.W.; Filliben, J.J. Addressing the amorphous content issue in quantitative phase analysis: The certification of NIST standard reference material 676a. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2011, 67, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 92. Moore, G.L. Introduction to Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science: Randburg, South Africa, 1988; pp. 1–309. ISBN 9780444599070. [Google Scholar] 93. Flory, P.J.; Rehner, J. Statistical Mechanics of Cross-Linked Polymer Networks II. Swelling. J. Chem. Phys. 1943, 11, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 94. Tobing, S.; Klein, A. Molecular Parameters and Their Relation to the Adhesive Performance of Emulsion Acrylic Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79, 2230–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 95. Vandenburg, H.J.; Clifford, A.A.; Bartle, K.D.; Carlson, R.E.; Carroll, J.; Newton, I.D. A simple solvent selection method for accelerated solvent extraction of additives from polymers. Analyst 1999, 124, 1707–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 96. Habib, S.; Lehocky, M.; Vesela, D.; Humpolíček, P.; Krupa, I.; Popelka, A. Preparation of Progressive Antibacterial LDPE Surface via Active Biomolecule Deposition Approach. Polymers 2019, 11, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 97. Adan, O.C.G. The Fungal Resistance of Interior Finishing Materials. Fundamentals of Mold Growth in Indoor Environments and Strategies for Healthy Living, 1st ed.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 335–352. ISBN 978-90-8686-722-6. [Google Scholar] 98. Machotová, J.; Kalendová, A.; Pejchalová, M.; Danková, M.; Palarčík, J. Samosíťující latexy s antibakteriálním účinkem a chemickou odolností nátěrových povlaků. Chem. Listy 2020, 114, 285–290. [Google Scholar] 99. Patnaik, P. Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003; p. 5299. ISBN 00-704-9439-8. [Google Scholar] 100. Tsavalas, J.G.; Sundberg, D.C. Hydroplasticization of Polymers: Model Predictions and Application to Emulsion Polymers. Langmuir 2010, 26, 6960–6966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 101. Jiang, B.; Tsavalas, J.G.; Sundberg, D.C. Water whitening of polymer films: Mechanistic studies and comparisons between water and solvent borne films. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 105, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 102. Horský, J.; Quadrat, O.; Porsch, B.; Mrkvičková, L.; Šňupárek, J. Effect of alkalinization on carboxylated latices prepared with various amount of a non-ionogenic hydrophilic comonomer 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001, 180, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 103. Bernal, S.; Botana, F.J.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Izquierdo, J.M. Behaviour of rare earth sesquioxides exposed to atmospheric carbon dioxide and water. React. Solids 1987, 4, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 104. Matsuzawa, K.; Mizusaki, T.; Mitsushima, S.; Kamiya, N.; Ota, K. The effect of La oxide additive on the solubility of NiO in molten carbonates. J. Power Sources 2005, 140, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 105. Bernal, S.; Botana, F.J.; García, R.; Rodríguez-Izquierdo, J.M. Thermal evolution of a sample of La2O3 exposed to the atmosphere. Thermochim. Acta 1983, 66, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 106. Balducci, G.; Diaz, L.B.; Gregory, D.H. Recent progress in the synthesis of nanostructured magnesium hydroxide. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 6067–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 107. Knotek, P.; Chanova, E.; Rypacek, F. AFM imaging and analysis of local mechanical properties for detection of surface pattern of functional groups. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1963–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 108. ISO4287, EN ISO 4287:2000; Geometrical Product Specification (GPS). Surface Texture. Profile Method. Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2000. 109. Smolík, J.; Knotek, P.; Schwarz, J.; Černošková, E.; Janíček, P.; Melánová, K.; Zárybnická, L.; Pouzar, M.; Kutálek, P.; Staněk, J.; et al. 3D micro-structuring by CW direct laser writing on PbO-Bi2O3-Ga2O3 glass. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 589, 152993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 110. Zhou, S.; Wu, L.; Xiong, M.; He, Q.; Chen, G. Dispersion and UV-VIS Properties of Nanoparticles in Coatings. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2005, 25, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 111. Ruckerova, A.; Machotova, J.; Svoboda, R.; Pukova, K.; Bohacik, P.; Valka, R. Ambient temperature self-crosslinking latices using low generation PAMAM dendrimers as inter-particle crosslinking agents. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 119, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 112. Machotová, J.; Kalendová, A.; Pitthardová, D.; Steinerová, D.; Stránská, E. Příprava vodou ředitelného samosíťujícího polymerního pojiva s odolností proti bleskové korozi. Chem. Listy 2019, 113, 745–750. [Google Scholar] 113. Nirwati, H.; Sinanjung, K.; Fahrunissa, F.; Wijaya, F.; Napitupulu, S.; Hati, V.P.; Hakim, M.S.; Meliala, A.; Aman, A.T.; Nuryastuti, T. Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital, Klaten, Indonesia. BMC Proc. 2019, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 114. Bengoechea, J.A.; Sa Pessoa, J. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection biology: Living to counteract host defences. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 43, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 115. Huycke, M.M.; Abrams, V.; Moore, D.R. Enterococcus faecalis produces extracellular superoxide and hydrogen peroxide that damages colonic epithelial cell DNA. Carcinogenesis 2002, 23, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 116. Geravand, M.; Fallah, P.; Yaghoobi, M.H.; Soleimanifar, F.; Farid, M.; Zinatizadeh, N.; Yaslianifard, S. Investigation of Enterococcus faecalis population in patients with polyp and colorectal cancer in comparison of healthy individuals. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2019, 56, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 117. Klasen, H.J. A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns. II. Renewed interest for silver. Burns 2000, 26, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 118. Yu, Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Li, P. Reactive Oxygen Species-Related Nanoparticle Toxicity in the Biomedical Field. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 119. Varkey, A.J.; Dlamini, M.D.; Mansuetus, A.B.; Tiruneh, A.T. Germicidal Action of Some Metals/Metal Ions in Combating E. coli Bacteria in Relation to Their Electro-Chemical Properties. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2013, 5, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 120. El Sayed, M.T.; El-Sayed, A.S. Biocidal Activity of Metal Nanoparticles Synthesized by Fusarium solani against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Mycotoxigenic Fungi. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 121. Feng, Q.L.; Wu, J.; Chen, G.Q.; Cui, F.Z.; Kim, T.N.; Kim, J.O. A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. 2000, 52, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 122. Liau, S.Y.; Read, D.C.; Pugh, W.J.; Furr, J.R.; Russell, A.D. Interaction of silver nitrate with readily identifiable groups: Relationship to the antibacterialaction of silver ions. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 25, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 123. Zheng, S.; Bawazir, M.; Dhall, A.; Kim, H.-E.; He, L.; Heo, J.; Hwang, G. Implication of Surface Properties, Bacterial Motility, and Hydrodynamic Conditions on Bacterial Surface Sensing and Their Initial Adhesion. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 643722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] 124. Yuan, Y.; Hays, M.P.; Hardwidge, P.R.; Kim, J. Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 14254–14261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 125. Samson, R.A.; Houbraken, J.; Thrane, U.; Frisvad, J.C.; Andersen, B. Food and Indoor Fungi; CBS-KNAW- Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 1–398. ISBN 978-94-91751-18-9. [Google Scholar] 126. Andersen, B.; Frisvad, J.C.; Søndergaard, I.; Rasmussen, I.S.; Larsen, L.S. Associations between Fungal Species and Water-Damaged Building Materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4180–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 127. Sharma, D.; Rajput, J.; Kaith, B.S.; Kaur, M.; Sharma, S. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and study of their antibacterial and antifungal properties. Thin Solid Film. 2010, 519, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 128. Eskandari, M.; Haghighi, N.; Ahmadi, V.; Haghighi, F.; Mohammadi, S.H. Growth and investigation of antifungal properties of ZnO nanorod arrays on the glass. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2011, 406, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 129. Sierra-Fernandez, A.; De La Rosa-García, S.C.; Gomez-Villalba, L.S.; Gómez-Cornelio, S.; Rabanal, M.E.; Fort, R.; Quintana, P. Synthesis, Photocatalytic, and Antifungal Properties of MgO, ZnO and Zn/Mg Oxide Nanoparticles for the Protection of Calcareous Stone Heritage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 24873–24886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
utb.fulltext.sponsorship	This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (project LM2018103). Authors PH and JV express thanks for project support from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic—DKRVO (RP/CPS/2022/001).
utb.wos.affiliation	[Steinerova, Denisa; Kalendova, Andrea; Machotova, Jana] Univ Pardubice, Fac Chem Technol, Inst Chem & Technol Macromol Mat, Pardubice 53210, Czech Republic; [Knotek, Petr] Univ Pardubice, Fac Chem Technol, Dept Gen & Inorgan Chem, Pardubice 53210, Czech Republic; [Humpolicek, Petr; Vajdak, Jan] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Ctr Polymer Syst, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic; [Slang, Stanislav] Univ Pardubice, Fac Chem Technol, Ctr Mat & Nanotechnol, Pardubice 53210, Czech Republic; [Krejcova, Anna] Univ Pardubice, Fac Chem Technol, Inst Environm & Chem Engn, Pardubice 53210, Czech Republic; [Benes, Ludvik] Univ Pardubice, Fac Chem Technol, Joint Lab Solid State Chem, Pardubice 53210, Czech Republic; [Wolff-Fabris, Felipe] European Ctr Dispers Technol, D-95100 Selb, Germany
utb.scopus.affiliation	Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic; Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic; Centre of Polymer Systems, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, 760 01, Czech Republic; Center of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic; Institute of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic; Joint Laboratory of Solid State Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic; European Center for Dispersion Technologies, Selb, 95100, Germany
utb.fulltext.projects	MSM LM2018103
utb.fulltext.projects	RP/CPS/2022/001
utb.fulltext.faculty	University Institute
utb.fulltext.faculty	University Institute
utb.fulltext.ou	Centre of Polymer Systems
utb.fulltext.ou	Centre of Polymer Systems