Alternative punishment as a suitable alternative to imprisonment

Lešková, Lýdia; Haburajová Ilavská, Lenka; García Martín, José

dc.title	Alternative punishment as a suitable alternative to imprisonment	en
dc.contributor.author	Lešková, Lýdia
dc.contributor.author	Haburajová Ilavská, Lenka
dc.contributor.author	García Martín, José
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Education Culture and Society
dc.identifier.issn	2081-1640 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued	2022
utb.relation.volume	13
utb.relation.issue	2
dc.citation.spage	39
dc.citation.epage	53
dc.type	article
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Pro Scientia Publica Foundation
dc.identifier.doi	10.15503/jecs2022.2.39.54
dc.relation.uri	https://jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/1501
dc.relation.uri	https://jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/1501/1225
dc.subject	alternative punishment	en
dc.subject	quantitative survey	en
dc.subject	monetary sentence	en
dc.subject	restorative justice	en
dc.subject	house arrest	en
dc.subject	compulsory labour (community service)	en
dc.description.abstract	Aim. The philosophy of alternative punishment is based on keeping the convicted person free, while imposing a punishment that will act preventively against committing another felony. The paper focuses on perceiving the importance of alternative punishment as part of restorative justice, and on presenting the results of the questionnaire survey which aimed to identify the public's preferences in the context of various forms of alternative punishments as an option, instead of imprisonment. Attention is paid to three alternative punishments, specifically: community service, house arrest, and monetary sentence (fine). Methods. The questionnaire survey aimed to find out what forms of alternative punishment are, according to the respondents, a suitable alternative to incarceration. The survey sample comprised of Slovak individuals (N=1078) aged from 16 years and older, thereof 31.3% men (N=337) and 68.7% women (N=741). Results. Based on the analysis of the data collected from the 1078 respondents' answers to the individual questions in the questionnaire, community service was identified as the most favorable alternative to imprisonment, whereas the least preferences the respondents gave to the option of monetary fines. Conclusion. The concept of alternative punishment is understood as a form of punishment that fulfills the purpose of a sentence, without deprivation of freedom, but still guaranteeing the fulfilment of a court-ordered unconditional retribution. Compared to traditional forms of punishment, alternative methods of resolving judicial cases do not enforce repression and prefer the individual approach to punishing the accused (convicted) persons with emphasis on corrective aspects of alternative punishment. The results of the survey showed that the respondents strongly prefer one form of alternative punishment, namely the community service.	en
utb.faculty	Faculty of Humanities
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1011217
utb.identifier.obdid	43883945
utb.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-85149337552
utb.identifier.wok	000872044600004
utb.source	J-wok
dc.date.accessioned	2022-11-29T07:49:20Z
dc.date.available	2022-11-29T07:49:20Z
dc.rights	Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.access	openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Haburajová Ilavská, Lenka
utb.fulltext.affiliation	Lýdia Lešková Faculty of Theology Košice, Department of Social Sciences Catholic University in Ružomberok Hlavná 89, 041 21 Košice, Slovakia E-mail adress: lydia.leskova@ku.sk ORCID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-8483-0313 Lenka Haburajová Ilavská Faculty of Humanities Tomas Bata University in Zlin Štefánikova 5670, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic E-mail adress: haburajova@utb.cz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-3381 José García Martín Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology University of Granada, Department of Sociology Calle Rector López Argüeta s/n, 18001 Granada, Spain E-mail address: jgarciamartin@ugr.es ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7401-0613
utb.fulltext.dates	Published 2022-09-27
utb.fulltext.references	[1] Bargel, M., & Mühlpachr, P. (2010). Inkluze versus exkluze – dilema sociální patologie [Inclusion versus exclusion – the dilemma of social pathology]. Institut mezioborových studií. [2] Bauman, Z. (2000). Social Issues of Law and Order. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 205-221. [3] Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2001). Restorative Community Justice: Repairing Harm and Transforming Communities. Routledge. [4] Braithwaite, J. (2000). The New Regulatory State and the Transformation of Criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 222-238. [5] Goulding, D. (2007). Recapturing Freedom: Issues Relating to the Release of Long-term Prisoners Into the Community. Hawkins Press. [6] Hayes, H. (2007). Reoffending and restorative justice. In G. Johnstone & D. W. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice (pp. 426-445). Willan Publishing. [7] Hunyadiová, S. (2017). Nenásilná komunikácia pomáhajúceho profesionála [Non-violent communication of the helping professional]. Lira-print. [8] Ivor, J., Polák, P., & Záhora, J. (2016). Trestné právo hmotné I. [Substantive criminal law I.]. Wolters Kluwer (Iura edition). [9] Ivor, J., & Záhora, J. (2019). Repetitórium trestného práva [Criminal Law Repertory]. Wolters Kluwer (Iura edition). [10]Jakubovich, K. (2020). Trest domáceho väzenia a elektronický monitoring v Slovenskej republike [House arrest and electronic monitoring in Slovakia Republic]. Sociálna prevencia, 15(1), 9-11. [11]Jewkes, Y., & Bennett, J. (2013). Dictionary of Prisons and Punishment. Willan. doi.org/10.4324/9781843926009 [12]Judák, V., Akimjak, A., Zimny, J., Kurilenko, V. B., & Tvrdoň, M. (2022). The importance of social and spiritual bringing in relation to Post-Covid society polarization in Slovakia. Acta Missiologica, 16(1), 126-137. [13]Jurčová, J. (2012). Alternatívne tresty [Alternative punishments]. Justičná revue, 64(4), 523-530. [14]Karabec, Z. (2000). Účel trestání [Purpose of punishment]. Kriminalistika, 33(2), 108-117. [15]Králik, R. & Máhrik, T. (2019a). Interpersonal relationships as the basis of student moral formation. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI 2019: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 8896-8900). IATED Academy. [16]Králik, R. & Máhrik, T. (2019b). Metaphysics as a base for improving critical Thinking. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI 2019: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, (pp. 8901-8903). IATED Academy. [17]Králik, R., Roubalová, M., Hlad, L., Judák, V., & Akimjak, A. (2022). Compassion and Solidarity with the Poor in Tanakh and Rabbinic Judaism. Acta Missiologica, 16(1), 154-168. [18]Lášticová, L., & Vajzerová, J. (2007). Alternatívne tresty a ich podstata [Alternative punishments and their substance]. In E. Vajzerová, L. Lášticová & Š. Ronec (Eds.), Alternatívne tresty v praxi [Alternative punishments in practice] (pp. 9-22). EDUKOS Consultation and Information Centre. [19]Lešková, L. (2013). Sociálny pracovník v penitenciárnej a postpenitenciárnej starostlivosti [Social worker in penitentiary and post-penitentiary care]. EU Tribune. [20]Lerman, A. E. (2009). The People Prisons Make: Effect of Incarceration on Criminal Psychology. In S. Raphael, & M. Stoll, M. (Eds.), Do Prisons Make Us Safer? The Benefits and Costs of the Prison Boom (pp. 151-176). Russell Sage Foundation. [21]Levrant, S., Cullen, F. T., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1999). Reconsidering Restorative Justice: the Corruption of Benevolence revisited? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(1), 3-27. [22]Lojan, R., & Vancáková, S. (2021). Milosrdenstvo voči odsúdeným v praxi [Mercy towards the condemned in practice]. In S. Vancáková (Eds.), Odsúdení: Život za mrežami a návrat na slobodu (pp. 395-408). Equilibria. [23]Lubelcová, G. (2005). Alternatívne tresty v kontexte stratégií spoločenskej regulácie kriminality [Alternative punishment in the context strategies societal control of crime]. Sociológia, 37(1), 33-58. [24]Mareš, P. (2006). Factors of social exclusion. Research Institute of Labour and Social Affairs. [25]Maturkanič, P., Tomanová Čergeťová, I., Konečná, I., Thurzo, V., Akimjak, A., Hlad, Ľ., Zimny, J., Roubalová, M., Kurilenko, V., Toman, M., Petrikovič, J., & Petrikovičová, L. (2022). Well-Being in the Context of COVID-19 and Quality of Life in Czechia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7164. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127164 [26]Mičková, K. (2020). Selected projects aimed at supporting families affected by poverty. In R. Lojan, & A. Vachnová (Eds.), Theology and social sciences from interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 156-184). Avalon. [27]Murgaš, F., Petrovič, F., Maturkanič, P., & Králik, R. (2022). Happiness or Quality of Life? Or Both? Journal of Education Culture and Society, 13(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.17.36 [28]Petrovič, F., Murgaš, F. & Králik, R. (2021). Happiness in Czechia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(19), 10826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910826 [29]Praško, J ., Vyskočilová, J., & Prašková, J. (2011). Úzkost a obavy [Anxiety and worry]. Portal. [30]Roberts, J. V. (2004). The Virtual Prison: Community Custody and the Evolution of Imprisonment. Cambridge University Press. [31]Roubalová, M., Králik, R., Zaitseva, E., Anikin, G. S., Popova, O. P., & Kondrla, P. (2021) Rabbinic Judaism’s perspective on the first crimes against humanity. Bogoslovni Vestnik, 81, 57-74. [32] Shearing, C. (2001). Punishment and the Changing Face of Governance. Punishment and Society, 3(2), 203-220. [33] Šuľová, M. (2015). Sociálna exklúzia osôb s duševnými poruchami [Social exclusion of people with mental disorders]. In L. Rosková (Eds.), Lidská práva v proměnách času, (pp. 83-93). Jihočeská univerzita. [34] Strémy, T., Kurilovská, L., & Vráblová, M. (2015). Restoratívna justícia [Restorative justice]. Leges. [35] Strémy, T., & Klátik, J. (2018). Alternatívne tresty [Alternative punishments]. C. H. Beck. [36]Tkáčová, H., Pavlíková, M., Jenisová, Z., Maturkanič, P., & Králik, R. (2021). Social Media and Students’ Wellbeing: An Empirical Analysis during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(18), 10442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442 [37]Tkáčová, H., Pavlíková, M., Tvrdoň, M. & Prokopyev, A. I. (2021). Existence and Prevention of Social Exclusion of Religious University Students due to Stereotyping. Bogosl. Vestn. (Theol. Q.), 81, 199-223. [38]Tkáčová, H., Al-Absiová, E., Al-Absi, & M., & Pavlíková, M. (2021). “Media Invasion” against Islam in the context of the Slovak Republic. Media Lit. Acad. Res, 4, 165-179. [39]Tkáčová, H., Pavlíková, M., Tvrdoň, M., & Jenisová, Z. (2021). The Use of Media in the Field of Individual Responsibility for Sustainable Development in Schools: A Proposal for an Approach to Learning about Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13, 4138. [40]Tvrdoň, M., Kondrla, P., & Mesarosova, L. (2021). Social work as a tool for anomie correction on second stage of primary school. AD ALTA – journal of interdisciplinary research, 11(1), 353-357. [41]Urbanová, M. (2006). Systémy sociální kontroly a právo [Systems of social control and the law]. Aleš Čeněk. [42]Van Ness, D.W., & Strong, K. H. (2009). Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice (4th edition). LexisNexis Group. [43]Zehr, H. (2003) Retributive justice, restorative justice. In G. Johnstone (Ed.), A Restorative Justice Reader (pp. 69-82). Willan Publishing.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship	-
utb.wos.affiliation	[Leskova, Lydia] Catholic Univ Ruzomberok, Fac Theol Kosice, Dept Social Sci, Hlavna 89, Kosice 04121, Slovakia; [Ilavska, Lenka Haburajova] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Humanities, Stefanikova 5670, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic; [Garcia Martin, Jose] Univ Granada, Dept Sociol, Fac Polit Sci & Sociol, Calle Rector Lopez Argueta S-N, Granada 18001, Spain
utb.scopus.affiliation	Faculty of Theology Košice, Department of Social Sciences, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Hlavná 89, Košice, 041 21, Slovakia; Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Štefánikova 5670, Zlín, 760 01, Czech Republic; Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology, University of Granada, Department of Sociology, Calle Rector López Argüeta s/n, Granada, 18001, Spain
utb.fulltext.projects	-
utb.fulltext.faculty	Faculty of Humanities
utb.fulltext.ou	-