Kontaktujte nás | Jazyk: čeština English
Název: | Emerging from the chaos of Management Theory Jungle: a historical analysis of the development of the four principles of management | ||||||||||
Autor: | Lloyd, Robert; Mertens, Daniel; Pálka, Přemysl; Perez, Salvador | ||||||||||
Typ dokumentu: | Recenzovaný odborný článek (English) | ||||||||||
Zdrojový dok.: | Journal of Management History. 2023 | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 1751-1348 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR) | ||||||||||
Journal Impact
This chart shows the development of journal-level impact metrics in time
|
|||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-01-2023-0001 | ||||||||||
Abstrakt: | Purpose: This paper aims to map the antecedents and precursory contexts regarding the four principles of management. Moreover, a description of its codification and coalescence as a unified teaching framework is provided, critically reviewing key theoretical underpinnings of management principles in academic research and management textbooks. Design/methodology/approach: A historiographic approach reviewed seminal works for theory origins of the four principles of management, by analyzing 260 management textbooks from 1935 to 2013 to document their adoption in management education. This study used critical hermeneutics (Prasad, 2002) to explore the framework’s progression by providing the context of cultural, political and economic influences. Findings: This research study tracked and mapped the creation of the four principles of management, as it became the commonly accepted teaching framework in management education. Today, every predominant management principles textbook uses the four principles of management – plan, lead, organize and control – as the basis for teaching students. Research limitations/implications: There is limited research on the application of the four principles of management in contemporary management, despite its ubiquity in management education. The study’s historical account of its formation provides insights into its adoption and utilization in modern education context. The study’s primary limitation stems from the generalization of the representative sample of textbooks used in the study (1917–2013). However, data saturation was achieved for the scale of textbooks and writings which was reviewed. Originality/value: Through a critical analysis into the formation of the four principles of management, this research not only provides a historical account of its construction but, as importantly, the influencing factors that led to its development. This research fills a gap in critical literature, as a post mortem exegesis has never been conducted on the four principles of management in the afteryears of its amalgamation. | ||||||||||
Plný text: | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMH-01-2023-0001/full/html | ||||||||||
Zobrazit celý záznam |