Comparison of MCDM methods with users' evaluation

Králík, Lukáš; Šenkeřík, Roman; Jašek, Roman

Title:

Author:

Králík, Lukáš; Šenkeřík, Roman; Jašek, Roman

Document type:

Conference paper (English)

Source document:

2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 2016, vol. 2016-July

ISSN:

2166-0727 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR)

Journal Impact This chart shows the development of journal-level impact metrics in time

JCR	Journal Citation Reports - Impact Factor
SNIP	SCImago Source Normalized Impact per Paper
SJR	SCImago Journal Rank
IPP	SCImago Impact per Publication
CS	Scopus CiteScore

(Note: The metrics are not comparable against one another.)

ISBN:

9789899843462

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2016.7521387

Abstract:

This paper responds to requirement to improve the orientation between offered SW, as ITIL tools. There are really a lot of amount thus offered tools and very often leads to poor implementation of ITIL on the basis of incorrectly chosen tools. Main objective of this paper is to provide an overview about possibilities of choosing a suitable tool. Simultaneously, the research described in this paper will serve for further work on creating a methodology for evaluation of ITIL tools. © 2016 AISTI.

Full text:

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7521387/

Show full item record

Files in this item

Name: Fulltext_1006650.pdf

Size: 254.3Kb

Format: PDF

Description: fulltext

ČSN ISO 690:2011 citation

Citace článku v konferenčním sborníku:
KRÁLÍK, Lukáš, Roman ŠENKEŘÍK a Roman JAŠEK. Comparison of MCDM methods with users' evaluation. In: 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) [online]. IEEE Computer Society, 2016 [cit. 2024-11-21]. ISSN 2166-0727. Dostupné z: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7521387/.

These citations are software generated and may contain errors. To verify accuracy, check the appropriate style guide.