Contact Us | Language: čeština English
Title: | Comparison of dialdehyde polysaccharides as crosslinkers for hydrogels: The case of poly(vinyl alcohol) | ||||||||||
Author: | Muchová, Monika; Münster, Lukáš; Vávrová, Alžběta; Capáková, Zdenka; Kuřitka, Ivo; Vícha, Jan | ||||||||||
Document type: | Peer-reviewed article (English) | ||||||||||
Source document: | Carbohydrate Polymers. 2022, vol. 279 | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 0144-8617 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR) | ||||||||||
Journal Impact
This chart shows the development of journal-level impact metrics in time
|
|||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119022 | ||||||||||
Abstract: | A little is known about the link between the macromolecular architecture of dialdehyde polysaccharides (DAPs), their crosslinking capabilities, and the properties of resulting hydrogels. Here, DAPs based on cellulose, dextrin, dextran, and hyaluronate were compared as crosslinkers for poly(vinyl alcohol), PVA. The swelling, network parameters, viscoelastic properties, porosity, and cytotoxicity of PVA/DAP hydrogels were investigated concerning the crosslinker structure, molecular weight, aldehyde group density per macromolecule, and the size of spontaneously formed crosslinker nano-assemblies. Generally, crosslinkers based on linear polysaccharides (cellulose, hyaluronate) performed more reliably, while the presence of branching could be both beneficial (dextran) but also detrimental (dextrin) at lower crosslinker concentrations. For example, the hydrogel swelling differed by up to one-third (600 vs. 400%) and storage modulus even by up to one half (~7000 vs. ~3500 Pa) depending on crosslinker structure and properties. These differences were rationalized by variances in crosslinking modes derived based on obtained data. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd | ||||||||||
Full text: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861721014090 | ||||||||||
Show full item record |