Contact Us | Language: čeština English
Title: | The effect of cosmetic treatment and gel laser therapy on the improvement of comedogenic skin type |
Author: | Pavlačková, Jana; Pecháčková, Hana; Egner, Pavlína; Mokrejš, Pavel; Gál, Robert; Janalíková, Magda |
Document type: | Peer-reviewed article (English) |
Source document: | Gels. 2023, vol. 9, issue 5 |
ISSN: | 2310-2861 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR) |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9050370 |
Abstract: | Comedogenic skin care receives little attention compared to the care or treatment of more serious acne manifestations. Traditional therapies may have limited success with potential side effects. Cosmetic care supported by the effect of a biostimulating laser may offer a desirable alternative. The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological effectiveness of combined cosmetic treatment with lasotherapy on comedogenic skin type using noninvasive bioengineering methods. Twelve volunteers with comedogenic skin type underwent a 28-week application of Lasocare Basic 645® cosmetic gel containing Lactoperoxidase and Lactoferrin in combination with laser therapy (Lasocare® method). The effect of treatment on skin condition was monitored using noninvasive diagnostic methods. The parameters were the amount of sebum, the pore count, the ultraviolet-induced red fluorescence assessment of comedonic lesions (percentage of the area and quantification of orange-red spots), hydration, transepidermal water loss, and pH. A statistically significant decrease in sebum production was observed on the skin of the treated volunteers, as well as a decrease in porphyrins, indicating the presence of Cutibacterium acnes populating comedones and causing enlarged pores. The balance of epidermal water in the skin was regulated adjusting the acidity of the skin coat in individual zones, which decreased the presence of Cutibacterium acnes. Cosmetic treatment in combination with the Lasocare® method successfully improved the condition of comedogenic skin. In addition to transient erythema, there were no other adverse effects. The chosen procedure appears to be a suitable and safe alternative to traditional treatment procedures known from dermatological practice. |
Full text: | https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/9/5/370 |
Show full item record |